sbanszky/EU-startup
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Add Micro–DC/README.md

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
sbanszky
2025-12-04 20:25:00 +00:00
parent 2ee85f5795
commit 7d61b83f7e
1 changed files with 261 additions and 0 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

261
Micro–DC/README.md Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,261 @@
````markdown
# AI Council OS — Sovereign Modular Micro-DC Blueprint
_Using the multi-agent “round table” prompt_
This README explains how to use the **AI Council OS** meta-prompt + **deployment blueprint** prompt to design and operate **sovereign, modular, eco-efficient micro-data centers** (GDPR-aligned, EU-centric).
---
## 1. What you have
You currently have **three main prompt artifacts**:
1. **Council Meta-Prompt (`meta: ...`)**
- Defines the **AI Council OS — Man in the Middle**.
- Declares **14 roles** (SRE, Network, Security, Compliance, Physical/Facility, etc).
- Specifies **outcome requirements** (zero manual provisioning, reproducible from Git, GDPR alignment, eco-efficiency, etc).
- Describes the **interaction model** (how the council debates and how responses are synthesized).
2. **Extended Roles**
- **Sovereign Compliance & Sustainability Lead (GDPR/EU Green)**
- **Physical Infrastructure & Facility Engineering Lead (Power/Cooling/EN 50600)**
These ensure physical/electrical/cooling design and EU compliance & sustainability are **first-class citizens** in every answer.
3. **Deployment Blueprint Example (`kind: deployment_blueprint`)**
- A concrete example of what the council should produce:
“Sovereign Modular Micro-DC v1 — EU/GDPR, Eco-Efficient”.
- Shows structure: `meta`, `context`, `assumptions`, `architecture`, `git_structure_and_pipelines`, `deployment_runbook`, `verification_and_validation`, `council_alignment`.
You'll use the **meta-prompt** as the “brain” and the **deployment blueprint** as the **shape of the output** you want.
---
## 2. Basic mental model
Think of this system as:
- A **virtual architecture council** with 14 seats (SRE, Network, Security, Compliance, Facility, etc).
- You give the council a **subject** (e.g. “Design Micro-DC v2 for Country X, with solar + district heating integration”).
- The council responds with **one coherent blueprint**, already cross-checked across roles.
**You don’t talk to each role individually**; the meta-prompt instructs the assistant to act as **one voice** that already integrated everyone’s input.
---
## 3. How to install / load the meta-prompt
This depends on where you run it (ChatGPT custom GPT, another LLM host, etc). Conceptually:
1. **Create a new “system” or “base” prompt**
- Paste the updated **Council OS meta-prompt YAML** into your **system** / **instructions** / **developer** field.
- If the platform doesn't support YAML literally, you can still paste it as text; what matters is the **content**, not YAML parsing.
2. **Mark it as persistent**
- This meta-prompt should be **always active** for that assistant/profile.
- All user queries will then be interpreted as “questions to the Council”.
3. **(Optional) Add the deployment blueprint as a template**
- Store the `deployment_blueprint` YAML either:
- As a **reference in your notes**, or
- As an **inline example** in the meta-prompt (e.g. under a section `example_output:`).
---
## 4. How to ask for a deployment blueprint
Once the meta-prompt is loaded, your normal usage looks like:
### 4.1. Generic invocation
You can say:
> **“Run the round-table and generate a deployment blueprint for \<scenario\>.”**
Examples:
- `Run the round-table: generate a deployment_blueprint for a sovereign micro-DC in Germany (50 kW IT load, liquid cooling for GPUs, district heat reuse).`
- `Generate a deployment_blueprint for a 200 kW regional micro-DC cluster (3 modules) with strict GDPR requirements for healthcare workloads.`
- `Create a deployment_blueprint to extend our existing micro-DC v1 into a federated EU-wide fleet (5 countries).`
The Council should respond with a YAML (or structured) document similar in shape to:
- `kind: "deployment_blueprint"`
- `name: "..."`, etc.
### 4.2. Being explicit about the structure
If you want to **enforce the shape** of the output, you can paste a short instruction like:
> “Use the same structure as the previously generated `deployment_blueprint`:
> `meta`, `context`, `assumptions`, `architecture`, `git_structure_and_pipelines`, `deployment_runbook`, `verification_and_validation`, `council_alignment`.”
You can also say:
> “Output only valid YAML, no commentary.”
if you want to drop it directly into a repo.
---
## 5. Recommended usage patterns
### 5.1. Designing a new module
1. **Start high-level**:
```text
Run the round-table to design "Sovereign Modular Micro-DC v2 — Country X".
Requirements:
- IT load: 150 kW
- Two modules, each 75 kW
- Mandatory waste heat reuse into local district heating
- 100% renewable energy target, mix of on-site solar and PPAs
- Healthcare data: must not leave EU/EEA
Generate a deployment_blueprint in YAML.
````
2. **Get the blueprint**, inspect, and then:
3. Ask for **zoom-ins**:
* “Drill down on the `Facility & Physical` section and give me a more detailed `site_manifest.yaml` example.”
* “Generate example OPA policies enforcing data-residency rules described in the blueprint.”
* “Give me Ansible role structure matching this deployment_runbook.”
### 5.2. Evolving an existing blueprint
If you already have a blueprint (like the v1 example):
1. Paste the blueprint (or refer to it).
2. Ask:
```text
Take this existing deployment_blueprint and evolve it to v2 with these changes:
- PUE target tightened to 1.2
- Add liquid cooling for GPU racks (30 kW per rack)
- Add integration with national grid flexibility services
Output a new deployment_blueprint, clearly naming it v2.
```
This taps the **Platform Lifecycle & Operations** plus **Facility** plus **Compliance** roles to propose a migration path, not just a new design.
---
## 6. How the Council's roles show up in answers
You don't need to call roles manually, but it helps to know what they cover:
* **Principal SRE/DevOps Architect** - overall shape, lifecycle, and reproducibility.
* **Bare-Metal, Virtualization, OpenStack, Network** – infra layers.
* **Automation & IaC, CI/CD & GitOps** - everything-as-code and pipelines.
* **Observability, SRE Reliability** - SLO/SLI, telemetry, self-healing.
* **Security Architect** - zero trust, IAM, secrets, audit.
* **Sovereign Compliance & Sustainability Lead** - GDPR, data residency, EU green frameworks.
* **Physical Infrastructure & Facility Engineering Lead** - power, cooling, EN 50600-style design to support compliance & sustainability goals.
* **Capacity & Performance, Platform Lifecycle & Operations** - capacity, performance, upgrades.
If you want a **specific angle strengthened**, ask for it:
* “Re-run this blueprint with a stronger focus from the Physical Infrastructure & Facility Engineering Lead on power and cooling for 30 kW GPU racks.”
* “Re-evaluate this design from the Sovereign Compliance & Sustainability Lead perspective and highlight any GDPR or EED gaps.”
---
## 7. Integrating with Git / documentation
The blueprint is already shaped to drop into a repo:
Suggested layout:
```text
infra/
council/
metaprompt.yaml # your AI Council OS config
README.md # this file
blueprints/
microdc-v1/
deployment_blueprint.yaml
site_manifest.example.yaml
policies.example.yaml
microdc-v2/
deployment_blueprint.yaml
```
You can:
* Track **versions**: `microdc-v1`, `microdc-v2`, etc.
* Open **issues** directly against the blueprint sections (e.g. “Cooling design doesn't match local building code — adjust.”).
* Use the blueprint as **source of truth** for:
* Terraform modules
* Ansible roles
* OPA policies
* GitOps manifests
---
## 8. Prompt snippets you can reuse
### 8.1. New site blueprint
```text
Use the AI Council OS meta-prompt and generate a new `deployment_blueprint`
for a sovereign, modular micro-data center in <COUNTRY>.
Constraints:
- IT load: <X> kW
- Number of modules: <N>
- Special workloads: <describe>
- Sustainability goals: <PUE target, renewable %, heat reuse, etc.>
Output valid YAML with the same structure as the "Sovereign Modular Micro–DC v1" example.
```
### 8.2. Gap analysis / review
```text
Here is our current deployment_blueprint for micro-DC v1 (YAML below).
Act as the AI Council OS and perform a cross-seat review focusing on:
- GDPR/data-sovereignty risks
- Physical/electrical/cooling compliance gaps
- Sustainability KPI realism (PUE/WUE/renewables)
Propose changes to the blueprint, not just a narrative. Output an updated YAML.
```
### 8.3. Implementation breakdown
```text
Given this deployment_blueprint, decompose it into:
- Terraform module list
- Ansible role and playbook structure
- Git repo layout
Stick to skeletal code structures and file names.
```
---
## 9. Tips & guardrails
* **Be explicit about output format**:
If you want copy-pasteable YAML, say “Output only YAML, no extra text.”
* **Keep “one source of truth”**:
When you update the blueprint, treat it like code: PRs, reviews, version tags.
* **Re-run the council for changes**:
When requirements change (new regulations, new energy goals), re-invoke the council to **produce a new version**, don't patch the old one by hand.
* **Use roles as “lenses”**:
Ask the council to respond with **emphasis** from certain roles if you want deeper detail in that domain (e.g., more from Compliance, or from Facility Engineering).
---
## 10. Next step
If you tell me:
* **Which country / region** you're targeting first, and
* Rough **power budget & workloads**,
I can generate:
* A **country-specific `deployment_blueprint`**, and
* An accompanying **`site_manifest.example.yaml`** that you can drop straight into your `infra-foundation` repo.
```
::contentReference[oaicite:0]{index=0}
```