553 lines
21 KiB
Plaintext
553 lines
21 KiB
Plaintext
meta:
|
|
format: toon
|
|
version: "1.0"
|
|
kind: "deployment_blueprint_template"
|
|
name: "Sovereign Modular Micro-DC — Global Template"
|
|
generated_by: "AI Council OS — 14-seat round table"
|
|
lastUpdated: "2026-DEC-05"
|
|
|
|
context:
|
|
objective: >
|
|
Deploy a repeatable, sovereign, eco-efficient micro-data center “module”
|
|
that can be cloned to multiple regions and countries. All infra must be
|
|
reproducible from Git, fully automated (zero manual provisioning), and
|
|
aligned with GDPR/data-sovereignty (where applicable) and local
|
|
sustainability/facility requirements.
|
|
primary_regime:
|
|
jurisdiction: "<REGULATORY_REGION> # e.g. EU/EEA, Member State: FR"
|
|
privacy: "<PRIMARY_PRIVACY_LAW> # e.g. GDPR + local data protection law"
|
|
dpia_required_for:
|
|
- "Healthcare data"
|
|
- "Large-scale processing of special categories of personal data"
|
|
- "AI/ML profiling of individuals at scale"
|
|
facility_standards:
|
|
- "EN 50600-oriented design"
|
|
- "<COUNTRY_SPECIFIC_ELECTRICAL_CODE>"
|
|
sustainability_frameworks:
|
|
- "EU Code of Conduct for Data Centres (or local equivalent)"
|
|
- "Energy Efficiency Directive (EED) thresholds where applicable"
|
|
target_use_cases:
|
|
- "AI/ML training and inference with GPUs"
|
|
- "SaaS / line-of-business apps"
|
|
- "Edge compute for public sector / industry"
|
|
design_principles:
|
|
- "Sovereign-by-design: clear mapping of data to jurisdiction and operators"
|
|
- "Modular: small, repeatable 'bricks' instead of bespoke facilities"
|
|
- "Infra-as-code and policy-as-code; no snowflake clusters"
|
|
- "Observability, SLOs, error budgets from day one"
|
|
- "Sustainability KPIs (PUE/WUE/renewables/reuse) are first-class"
|
|
|
|
assumptions:
|
|
module_scale:
|
|
it_load_kw: 80 # adjust per deployment
|
|
racks_total: 8
|
|
racks_gpu: 2
|
|
racks_compute: 4
|
|
racks_storage: 2
|
|
location_examples:
|
|
- "Paris, France (EU-PAR-FR01)"
|
|
- "Paris, France (EU-PAR-FR02)"
|
|
- "Frankfurt, Germany (EU-FRA-DE01)"
|
|
- "Berlin, Germany (EU-BER-DE02)"
|
|
- "Amsterdam, Netherlands (EU-AMS-NL01)"
|
|
- "Rome, Italy (EU-ROM-IT01)"
|
|
- "New York, United States (US-NY-US01)"
|
|
stack_choice:
|
|
bare_metal: "MAAS (or equivalent) for server discovery/commissioning"
|
|
virtualization: "Proxmox VE or similar on most nodes; bare-metal K8s for GPU nodes optional"
|
|
cloud_layer: "Kubernetes as primary control plane; OpenStack optional add-on"
|
|
storage: "Ceph (NVMe + HDD tiers) + object storage; local NVMe cache on GPU nodes"
|
|
automation_stack:
|
|
iac:
|
|
- "Terraform for network/DCIM/inventory where APIs exist"
|
|
- "Ansible for OS/provisioning/bootstrap"
|
|
gitops:
|
|
- "Argo CD or Flux for K8s/OpenStack configuration"
|
|
policy_as_code:
|
|
- "OPA/Kyverno, CI policy checks, security/compliance gates"
|
|
sovereign_controls:
|
|
residency:
|
|
- "All primary storage and processing located within approved jurisdictions"
|
|
- "Backups replicated only within approved sovereign scope"
|
|
data_classification_levels:
|
|
- "PUBLIC"
|
|
- "INTERNAL"
|
|
- "PERSONAL"
|
|
- "SENSITIVE_PERSONAL"
|
|
- "CRITICAL_SOVEREIGN_<COUNTRY_CODE>"
|
|
cross_border_rules:
|
|
- "CRITICAL_SOVEREIGN_<COUNTRY_CODE>: must not leave the country"
|
|
- "SENSITIVE_PERSONAL: must not leave defined region (e.g., EU/EEA)"
|
|
- "PERSONAL: only with approved transfer mechanism and DPO sign-off"
|
|
|
|
regions_and_sites:
|
|
overview: >
|
|
Initial seed footprint of seven sovereign micro-DC modules across Europe
|
|
and North America. All sites follow this global template with local
|
|
overlays for power, cooling, connectivity, and regulatory specifics.
|
|
sites:
|
|
- code: "EU-PAR-FR01"
|
|
country: "FR"
|
|
city: "PAR"
|
|
role: "Primary EU hub - Paris #1"
|
|
status: "planned"
|
|
- code: "EU-PAR-FR02"
|
|
country: "FR"
|
|
city: "PAR"
|
|
role: "Secondary EU hub - Paris #2"
|
|
status: "planned"
|
|
- code: "EU-FRA-DE01"
|
|
country: "DE"
|
|
city: "FRA"
|
|
role: "Primary DE hub - Frankfurt"
|
|
status: "planned"
|
|
- code: "EU-BER-DE02"
|
|
country: "DE"
|
|
city: "BER"
|
|
role: "Secondary DE hub - Berlin"
|
|
status: "planned"
|
|
- code: "EU-AMS-NL01"
|
|
country: "NL"
|
|
city: "AMS"
|
|
role: "Primary NL hub - Amsterdam"
|
|
status: "planned"
|
|
- code: "EU-ROM-IT01"
|
|
country: "IT"
|
|
city: "ROM"
|
|
role: "Primary IT hub - Rome"
|
|
status: "planned"
|
|
- code: "US-NY-US01"
|
|
country: "US"
|
|
city: "NY"
|
|
role: "Primary US hub - New York"
|
|
status: "planned"
|
|
|
|
naming_conventions:
|
|
overview: >
|
|
Canonical naming scheme for sites and devices, used consistently in all
|
|
blueprints, IaC, monitoring, documentation and inventory systems. Pattern
|
|
is designed to be global (multi-continent), sovereign-aware (country),
|
|
location-specific (city) and module/rack/device specific.
|
|
|
|
site_code:
|
|
pattern: "<CONTINENT>-<CITY>-<COUNTRY><NN>"
|
|
description: >
|
|
Human- and machine-readable identifier for a physical site/module.
|
|
Always use fixed-width 2-digit numeric suffix <NN> for uniqueness.
|
|
examples:
|
|
- "EU-PAR-FR01 # Paris, France - primary"
|
|
- "EU-PAR-FR02 # Paris, France - secondary"
|
|
- "EU-FRA-DE01 # Frankfurt, Germany - first DE site"
|
|
- "EU-BER-DE02 # Berlin, Germany - second DE site"
|
|
- "EU-AMS-NL01 # Amsterdam, Netherlands - first NL site"
|
|
- "EU-ROM-IT01 # Rome, Italy - first IT site"
|
|
- "US-NY-US01 # New York, USA - first US site"
|
|
components:
|
|
continent:
|
|
code_values:
|
|
- "EU # Europe"
|
|
- "US # United States"
|
|
notes: "Extend with other continents (AP, AF, SA, OC, AS, etc.) as needed."
|
|
country:
|
|
code_values:
|
|
- "FR # France"
|
|
- "DE # Germany"
|
|
- "NL # Netherlands"
|
|
- "IT # Italy"
|
|
- "US # United States"
|
|
notes: "Use ISO-like 2-letter codes for countries."
|
|
city:
|
|
code_values:
|
|
- "PAR # Paris"
|
|
- "MAR # Marseille"
|
|
- "BOR # Bordeaux"
|
|
- "NAN # Nantes"
|
|
- "FRA # Frankfurt"
|
|
- "BER # Berlin"
|
|
- "AMS # Amsterdam"
|
|
- "ROM # Rome"
|
|
- "NY # New York"
|
|
notes: >
|
|
City codes are stable mnemonics; define centrally (e.g. in a YAML map)
|
|
and reuse. For new cities, extend the map only via PR review.
|
|
index:
|
|
pattern: "NN # 01-99"
|
|
notes: >
|
|
Unique per country; 01 usually primary site in that country, 02
|
|
secondary, etc. Example: EU-FRA-DE01 (first DE site, Frankfurt),
|
|
EU-BER-DE02 (second DE site, Berlin).
|
|
|
|
rack_code:
|
|
pattern: "<SITE>-RK<rr>"
|
|
description: >
|
|
Identifies a specific rack within a site. Can be extended with room/zone
|
|
information when necessary while preserving RK<rr> as the rack index.
|
|
examples:
|
|
- "EU-PAR-FR01-RK01"
|
|
- "EU-PAR-FR01-RK02"
|
|
- "EU-FRA-DE01-RK01"
|
|
- "EU-BER-DE02-RK01"
|
|
- "EU-AMS-NL01-RK01"
|
|
- "EU-ROM-IT01-RK01"
|
|
- "US-NY-US01-RK01"
|
|
extensions:
|
|
room_or_zone:
|
|
description: >
|
|
If racks span multiple rooms/zones, use a suffix or infix such as
|
|
RK01A, RK02B or Z1-RK01 as standardised in the physical model.
|
|
examples:
|
|
- "EU-PAR-FR01-Z1-RK01"
|
|
- "EU-PAR-FR01-RK01A"
|
|
|
|
device_code:
|
|
pattern: "<SITE>-RK<rr>-<DEVICE><dd>"
|
|
description: >
|
|
Identifies a specific device in a rack. DEVICE is a short type code;
|
|
<dd> is a 2-digit index, except for devices that traditionally use
|
|
letter suffixes (e.g., PDUs A/B).
|
|
examples:
|
|
firewalls:
|
|
- "EU-PAR-FR01-RK01-FW01"
|
|
- "EU-PAR-FR02-RK01-FW01"
|
|
- "EU-FRA-DE01-RK01-FW01"
|
|
- "EU-BER-DE02-RK01-FW01"
|
|
management_nodes:
|
|
- "EU-PAR-FR01-RK01-mgmt01 # Local management node (e.g. MAAS rack controller)"
|
|
- "EU-FRA-DE01-RK01-mgmt01"
|
|
- "US-NY-US01-RK01-mgmt01"
|
|
switches:
|
|
- "EU-PAR-FR01-RK01-tor01 # ToR / L3 switch"
|
|
- "EU-PAR-FR01-RK02-tor02"
|
|
- "EU-FRA-DE01-RK01-lf01 # Leaf switch"
|
|
- "EU-FRA-DE01-RK01-sp01 # Spine switch"
|
|
- "EU-BER-DE02-RK01-sp02 # Spine switch"
|
|
- "EU-AMS-NL01-RK01-tor01"
|
|
- "EU-ROM-IT01-RK01-tor01"
|
|
- "US-NY-US01-RK01-tor01"
|
|
servers:
|
|
- "EU-PAR-FR01-RK01-srv01"
|
|
- "EU-PAR-FR02-RK01-srv01"
|
|
- "EU-FRA-DE01-RK01-srv01"
|
|
- "EU-BER-DE02-RK01-srv01"
|
|
- "EU-AMS-NL01-RK01-srv01"
|
|
- "EU-ROM-IT01-RK01-srv01"
|
|
- "US-NY-US01-RK01-srv01"
|
|
storage:
|
|
- "EU-PAR-FR01-RK01-san01 # SAN array"
|
|
- "EU-FRA-DE01-RK01-nas01 # NAS filer"
|
|
- "EU-AMS-NL01-RK01-jbd01 # JBOD / disk shelf"
|
|
monitoring:
|
|
- "EU-PAR-FR01-RK01-mon01"
|
|
- "EU-FRA-DE01-RK01-mon01"
|
|
- "US-NY-US01-RK01-mon01"
|
|
power:
|
|
- "EU-PAR-FR01-RK01-pduA"
|
|
- "EU-PAR-FR01-RK01-pduB"
|
|
- "EU-FRA-DE01-RK01-pduA"
|
|
- "US-NY-US01-RK01-pduA"
|
|
|
|
device_type_codes:
|
|
tor: "Top of Rack switch (often L3 capable)"
|
|
ss: "Super spine"
|
|
sp: "Spine"
|
|
blf: "Border leaf"
|
|
lf: "Leaf"
|
|
fw: "Firewall"
|
|
lb: "Load balancer"
|
|
srv: "Server (compute/GPU/infra)"
|
|
san: "SAN storage array"
|
|
nas: "NAS filer"
|
|
jbd: "JBOD / disk shelf"
|
|
oob: "Out-of-band management device"
|
|
mgmt: "Generic management node (e.g., MAAS, jump host)"
|
|
mon: "Monitoring / logging node"
|
|
pduA: "Rack PDU side A"
|
|
pduB: "Rack PDU side B"
|
|
|
|
implementation_notes:
|
|
- "Enforce naming via IaC modules (variables, templates, validation in CI)."
|
|
- "Monitoring, CMDB and inventory tools must use these names as primary identifiers."
|
|
- "No ad-hoc names; new device types must extend the device_type_codes map and be reviewed."
|
|
- "Where external systems impose constraints (e.g. 15-char limits), define deterministic truncation rules."
|
|
|
|
architecture:
|
|
layers:
|
|
- name: "Facility & Physical Module (Physical Infrastructure & Facility Engineering Lead)"
|
|
description: >
|
|
Physical micro-DC module: room/container, racks, power, cooling,
|
|
structured cabling, environmental monitoring, aligned with local
|
|
building/electrical codes and EN 50600-style principles.
|
|
design:
|
|
form_factor:
|
|
options:
|
|
- "Prefabricated container (2-4 racks) for remote/edge sites"
|
|
- "Dedicated technical room in existing building for 6-10 racks"
|
|
power:
|
|
utility_feeds: "At least 1 primary + 1 secondary where feasible"
|
|
ups_topology: "Modular online UPS, N+1"
|
|
generator:
|
|
presence: true
|
|
autonomy_hours: 8
|
|
redundancy_level: "N+1 for IT load, 2N for critical infra when justified"
|
|
per_rack_pdu:
|
|
type: "Intelligent, metered, switched"
|
|
cooling:
|
|
primary:
|
|
type: "In-row or rear-door cooling units"
|
|
free_cooling:
|
|
enabled: true
|
|
gpu_rack_density_kw: 20
|
|
cpu_rack_density_kw: 8
|
|
monitoring:
|
|
sensors:
|
|
- "Rack inlet temperature"
|
|
- "Rack exhaust temperature"
|
|
- "Room temperature and humidity"
|
|
- "PDU-level power and voltage"
|
|
telemetry_export:
|
|
protocol: "SNMP/Modbus translated to Prometheus metrics"
|
|
|
|
- name: "Network & Connectivity (Network Architect)"
|
|
design:
|
|
topology:
|
|
underlay: "Leaf-spine, 2x spine, dual ToR per rack where cost-effective"
|
|
uplinks_per_rack: 2
|
|
routing: "L3 to the top, BGP between ToR and spines"
|
|
segmentation:
|
|
vrfs:
|
|
- name: "INFRA_MGMT"
|
|
- name: "TENANT"
|
|
- name: "STORAGE"
|
|
- name: "OUT_OF_BAND"
|
|
wan:
|
|
connectivity:
|
|
- "Dual ISPs where feasible"
|
|
sovereignty:
|
|
- "All VPN termination in approved jurisdictions; keys managed by sovereign entities"
|
|
|
|
- name: "Compute, Storage & Virtualization (Virtualization Architect, Capacity & Performance Engineer)"
|
|
design:
|
|
node_types:
|
|
- name: "compute-standard"
|
|
cpu: "2 x 32-core"
|
|
ram_gb: 512
|
|
- name: "compute-gpu"
|
|
cpu: "2 x 32-core, NUMA-aligned"
|
|
gpus: 4
|
|
ram_gb: 768
|
|
- name: "storage-ceph"
|
|
cpu: "1 x 24-core"
|
|
ram_gb: 256
|
|
hypervisor:
|
|
platform: "Proxmox VE or similar"
|
|
storage:
|
|
ceph:
|
|
pools:
|
|
- name: "k8s-block"
|
|
- name: "gpu-block"
|
|
- name: "object-archive"
|
|
|
|
- name: "Platform & Workloads (Principal SRE, Automation & IaC Lead, OpenStack Architect)"
|
|
design:
|
|
provisioning_flow:
|
|
- "Bare metal discovery/commissioning"
|
|
- "Hypervisor or K8s node OS install via Ansible"
|
|
- "GitOps applies cluster and app layer"
|
|
clusters:
|
|
k8s:
|
|
ha_control_plane: 3
|
|
openstack_optional:
|
|
enabled: false
|
|
multi_tenancy:
|
|
k8s:
|
|
namespaces:
|
|
- "<COUNTRY_CODE>-public"
|
|
- "<COUNTRY_CODE>-internal"
|
|
- "<COUNTRY_CODE>-personal"
|
|
- "<COUNTRY_CODE>-sensitive"
|
|
- "<COUNTRY_CODE>-critical-sovereign"
|
|
|
|
- name: "Compliance, Sovereignty & Sustainability (Sovereign Compliance & Sustainability Lead, Physical Infrastructure Lead, Security Architect)"
|
|
design:
|
|
data_residency:
|
|
rules:
|
|
- "Critical sovereign namespaces use storage classes bound to local pools only."
|
|
- "Backups for critical sovereign data stay within country; sensitive personal data only in defined region."
|
|
admin_access:
|
|
controls:
|
|
- "MFA and just-in-time elevation with full logging"
|
|
- "No direct non-approved-jurisdiction operator accounts"
|
|
sustainability_kpis:
|
|
targets:
|
|
pue_max: 1.4
|
|
renewable_share_min_percent: 70
|
|
energy_reuse_target: "Heat reuse where feasible"
|
|
measurement:
|
|
- "Facility meters integrated into telemetry"
|
|
- "Sustainability dashboards and reports"
|
|
|
|
git_structure_and_pipelines:
|
|
repos:
|
|
- name: "infra-foundation"
|
|
contents:
|
|
- "facility/site_manifests/"
|
|
- "facility/rack_layouts/"
|
|
- "facility/power_and_cooling/"
|
|
- "network/terraform/"
|
|
- "hypervisor/ansible/"
|
|
- "baremetal/profiles/"
|
|
- name: "platform-clusters"
|
|
contents:
|
|
- "k8s/clusters/<site_codes>/"
|
|
- "addons/monitoring-logging-security/"
|
|
- name: "policies-and-compliance"
|
|
contents:
|
|
- "data-classification.yaml"
|
|
- "opa-policies/"
|
|
- "sustainability-kpis.yaml"
|
|
- "rbac-and-iam.yaml"
|
|
ci_cd:
|
|
pipeline_stages:
|
|
- name: "lint_and_unit"
|
|
- name: "policy_gates"
|
|
- name: "integration_test"
|
|
- name: "promotion_to_template"
|
|
- name: "site_rollout"
|
|
|
|
deployment_runbook:
|
|
phases:
|
|
- phase: 0
|
|
name: "Policy & Site Definition"
|
|
owners:
|
|
- "Sovereign Compliance & Sustainability Lead"
|
|
- "Physical Infrastructure & Facility Engineering Lead"
|
|
- phase: 1
|
|
name: "Facility Build-Out"
|
|
- phase: 2
|
|
name: "Network & Out-of-Band Bring-Up"
|
|
- phase: 3
|
|
name: "Bare-Metal & Hypervisor Provisioning"
|
|
- phase: 4
|
|
name: "Platform Bootstrap"
|
|
- phase: 5
|
|
name: "Compliance & Telemetry Validation"
|
|
- phase: 6
|
|
name: "Workload Onboarding"
|
|
- phase: 7
|
|
name: "Scale-Out & Federation"
|
|
|
|
verification_and_validation:
|
|
automated_checks:
|
|
- "IaC unit/integration tests"
|
|
- "Policy-as-code checks for residency and security"
|
|
- "Post-deploy conformance tests for network, storage, and platform"
|
|
manual_reviews:
|
|
- "DPO/legal review for data protection alignment"
|
|
- "Facility audit for physical security and safety"
|
|
- "Sustainability review vs targets"
|
|
continuous_improvement:
|
|
- "Chaos drills to validate reliability"
|
|
- "Post-incident reviews feeding into blueprint updates"
|
|
- "Versioned evolution with clear change logs"
|
|
|
|
limitations_risks_open_questions:
|
|
key_limitations_and_risks:
|
|
- id: "LR1"
|
|
title: "Skill gap in policy and CI/CD tooling"
|
|
description: >
|
|
Building OPA policies, complex CI/CD pipelines and network verification
|
|
(e.g. Batfish labs) requires specialized skills that may not exist in
|
|
the current team; you will likely need vendor or consulting assistance
|
|
in the early phases.
|
|
owner_role: "CI/CD & GitOps Governance Lead"
|
|
supporting_roles:
|
|
- "Automation & IaC Lead (Ansible/Terraform/Python SDK)"
|
|
- "Security Architect (Zero Trust, Compliance)"
|
|
mitigation_ideas:
|
|
- "Plan and budget for initial external enablement (consultants, vendor PS, training)."
|
|
- "Create internal champions and pair them with experts during first implementations."
|
|
- "Codify patterns into reusable modules and templates to reduce ongoing complexity."
|
|
|
|
- id: "LR2"
|
|
title: "Tooling complexity and operational reliability"
|
|
description: >
|
|
The reference pipeline uses many components (IaC, GitOps, OPA, observability,
|
|
network verification, etc.). Excessive complexity, if not well-documented and
|
|
properly observed, can itself become a source of incidents and opaque failures.
|
|
owner_role: "Principal SRE/DevOps Architect"
|
|
supporting_roles:
|
|
- "SRE Reliability Engineering Lead"
|
|
- "Platform Lifecycle & Operations Lead"
|
|
mitigation_ideas:
|
|
- "Standardize on a minimal-but-sufficient toolset and deprecate unused options."
|
|
- "Introduce strict documentation requirements and runbooks for every critical tool."
|
|
- "Continuously measure pipeline reliability as an SLO and reduce moving parts where needed."
|
|
|
|
- id: "LR3"
|
|
title: "Cultural shift to Git-first and pipeline-first operations"
|
|
description: >
|
|
The model depends on all engineers adopting Git-first, pipeline-first behavior.
|
|
Any persistent CLI-driven culture (manual changes on devices or clusters) undermines
|
|
reproducibility, auditability, and reliability of the entire system.
|
|
owner_role: "CI/CD & GitOps Governance Lead"
|
|
supporting_roles:
|
|
- "Principal SRE/DevOps Architect"
|
|
- "Platform Lifecycle & Operations Lead"
|
|
mitigation_ideas:
|
|
- "Define and enforce 'no manual changes' policies with exceptions tightly controlled."
|
|
- "Provide onboarding, training and internal advocacy for GitOps practices."
|
|
- "Instrument drift detection and alert on out-of-band changes to drive behavioral change."
|
|
|
|
- id: "LR4"
|
|
title: "AI fabric modeling for InfiniBand/RoCE"
|
|
description: >
|
|
Simulating and testing AI/ML fabric behavior (InfiniBand/RoCE, congestion control,
|
|
ECN, QoS) in a lab may be limited compared to real production hardware. This can
|
|
leave blind spots in performance and failure-mode validation.
|
|
owner_role: "Capacity & Performance Engineer"
|
|
supporting_roles:
|
|
- "Network Architect (Spine/Leaf/BGP/EVPN)"
|
|
- "Virtualization Architect (Proxmox/ESXi/KVM)"
|
|
mitigation_ideas:
|
|
- "Use representative scaled-down fabric topologies with real NICs/switches for key tests."
|
|
- "Baseline and continuously compare production telemetry against lab expectations."
|
|
- "Plan phased rollouts and canary deployments for new fabric features or firmware."
|
|
|
|
open_questions:
|
|
- id: "OQ1"
|
|
prompt: >
|
|
What is the minimum viable toolset (IaC, GitOps, policy, observability, network
|
|
verification) that balances sovereignty, safety and sustainability without
|
|
overwhelming smaller operations teams?
|
|
owner_role: "Principal SRE/DevOps Architect"
|
|
- id: "OQ2"
|
|
prompt: >
|
|
How should AI/ML fabric performance and fairness (e.g. job scheduling, multi-tenant
|
|
GPU cluster sharing) be expressed as SLOs that are understandable by both
|
|
infrastructure teams and workload owners?
|
|
owner_role: "SRE Reliability Engineering Lead"
|
|
- id: "OQ3"
|
|
prompt: >
|
|
For smaller sovereign micro-DCs, when does it make sense to offload certain
|
|
non-personal workloads to hyperscale cloud vs. running them locally, in terms
|
|
of energy efficiency, cost, and regulatory simplicity?
|
|
owner_role: "Sovereign Compliance & Sustainability Lead (GDPR/EU Green)"
|
|
|
|
council_alignment:
|
|
outcome_requirements_satisfied:
|
|
- "zero_manual_provisioning"
|
|
- "zero_snowflake_clusters"
|
|
- "fully_reproducible_infra_from_git"
|
|
- "multi_dc_consistency"
|
|
- "ha_control_planes"
|
|
- "predictable_gpu_performance"
|
|
- "automated_lifecycle_management"
|
|
- "telemetry_and_self_healing"
|
|
- "clear_slo_sli_error_budgets"
|
|
- "security_and_compliance_built_in"
|
|
- "gdpr_and_data_sovereignty_alignment"
|
|
- "eco_efficiency_and_sustainability_kpis"
|
|
- "architecture_must_be_deployable"
|
|
- "all_answers_validated_by_cross_seat_consensus"
|
|
```
|